Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.
After years with same outside counsel, Somerset trustees discuss exploring new legal representation
Loading...
Summary
Some trustees expressed concerns about tone and objectivity from the district’s long‑time outside counsel and supported requesting proposals; others defended the incumbent firm's competence and responsiveness. Board agreed to consider an RFP and place the item on the next meeting agenda.
Trustees discussed whether to seek proposals for alternative legal counsel after using the same outside firm for many years.
One trustee said recent interactions left members wanting a different tone and suggested a Wisconsin‑based school law firm might better fit district needs. "I've been asked... is our firm, you know, Minnesota? I do think they are in Minnesota," the trustee said, noting a preference for counsel closer to Wisconsin and speaking to perceived objectivity concerns.
Other trustees stressed that the current firm is licensed and experienced in Wisconsin law and praised responsiveness, including availability for urgent calls. The chair recommended a public, transparent process if the board wishes to pursue alternatives: "If it were my decision... I would recommend that we don't move away from the current firm... Having said that, it's not uncommon for districts to make a choice to change legal representation from time to time."
The board did not vote to change counsel that evening but agreed to place the topic on the next meeting agenda so members can decide whether to direct administration to develop an RFP or process for soliciting proposals. Administration said it would draft a suggested process for the board to review.
