Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Branding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakewood arts panel debates 30th‑anniversary logo; asks for refinements and written feedback
Summary
The Lakewood Arts Commission reviewed four 30th‑anniversary logo concepts tied to a “Deep Roots” theme, discussed reproducibility and the use of the city name/dates, and agreed to collect written preferences and requests for Hemisphere to revise the designs.
The Lakewood Arts Commission met to review four proposed logo concepts for the city’s 30th anniversary and asked staff and the city’s marketing contractor to return with refined versions after commissioners supply written feedback.
Commissioner-led discussion centered on two competing needs: a visually distinctive mark that evokes the anniversary and a design simple enough to reproduce across signage, embroidered swag and single‑color applications. Presenter (Speaker 6), who led the briefing, described the unifying theme as “DeepRoots,” noting the intent was to create a badge to pair with existing City of Lakewood materials and a proclamation adopted by council in February.
Commission members praised the coin option for its historical reference but raised technical concerns about detail and scalability. One commissioner said, “If the tree is just by itself on 30, what’s happening with it?” (Speaker 10). Several commissioners preferred a stylized tree or leaf tied visually to the coin so the identity reads clearly at distance and in single‑color reproductions. Speaker 1 said, “Design number 4 ... has a lot of impact,” while Speaker 10 urged simplifying the leaf so “it will reproduce easier.”
The commission discussed whether the mark should include the numerals “30,” the full phrase “thirtieth anniversary” or the 1996–2026 date range. Several members recommended including “City of Lakewood” near the mark to avoid ambiguity if the badge is used alone.
Rather than an on‑the‑spot vote, the commission decided members would annotate paper slips and email written votes and comments so staff can aggregate guidance for Hemisphere. Speaker 3 (the chair) asked members to submit preferences quickly so communications staff can prepare revised iterations for the next steps.
Next steps: commissioners will submit written comments and votes; staff will summarize feedback and provide updated designs to the commission for final recommendation to the city manager and (if needed) city council.
