Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collective Bargaining topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cromwell School District board moves to hold a closed "nonmeeting" to discuss collective bargaining over possible move to Connecticut State Partnership Plan
Summary
At an evening meeting, the Cromwell School District board approved its agenda and moved to convene a closed "nonmeeting" to discuss collective bargaining strategies with district unions about a possible migration to the Connecticut State Partnership Plan; the transcript records procedural questions about executive session rules and stopping the public broadcast.
Get email alerts on the Collective Bargaining topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Cromwell School District board announced it would convene a closed "nonmeeting" to discuss collective bargaining strategies related to a possible move to the Connecticut State Partnership Plan, the chair said during an evening session.
"We are convening into a non meeting for the purpose of discussing collective bargaining strategies with our Cromwell unions regarding the possible migration to the Connecticut State Partnership Plan," the chair (Speaker 2) told attendees, and asked non-board members to leave while requesting that Dr. Macquarie and Mr. Morrow remain.
The announcement came after the board approved the meeting agenda by voice vote following a motion and a second; the chair thanked "Mister Schuman" for the second and members responded "Aye." The transcript does not record the formal date of the meeting or a roll-call tally for the later nonmeeting motion.
A board member (Speaker 1) asked why the board was not using an executive session instead. "I so I spoke with Jessica Renner, and she said because it's part of collective collective bargaining, you don't have to go into executive session," the member said, describing advice they received and explaining the rationale for using a nonmeeting.
Board participants then discussed procedural mechanics: a nonmeeting must not be broadcast, so the public feed would be stopped before private bargaining discussions could occur. A staff participant (Speaker 3) and the chair confirmed that the nonmeeting would not be web-broadcast and that no separate vote is required to enter a nonmeeting, according to their exchange in the transcript.
The transcript records the board asking for a show of agreement and brief verbal responses but does not include a formal recorded vote on the nonmeeting motion. The transcript also does not explain details of the Connecticut State Partnership Plan or any timeline for bargaining; the chair identified only that the discussion would center on "possible migration" of district unions to that plan.
Next steps were not specified in the transcript: the board stopped the public broadcast to move into the nonmeeting, and the meeting record does not show further public action or a follow-up date.

