Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Inspector General warns of curtailed record access; council asks for investigative clarifications

Baltimore City Council Public Safety Committee · April 28, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Inspector General Isabelle Cummings told council members her office has lost some direct access to city systems since January 2023, has issued multiple subpoenas and cannot provide routine case updates; members requested examples of investigative searches, aggregate complaint breakdowns and more transparency on thresholds for opening investigations.

Inspector General Isabelle Cummings told the Public Safety Committee that the Office of Inspector General is largely complaint‑driven and that the office’s ability to access city records has been reduced in ways that limit its investigative tools.

Cummings said the OIG’s hotline receives roughly 800 complaints a year but only a fraction turn into full investigations; the office ran about 40 investigations in the last year. "We do not have the ability to sit around and ... do something like that," she said, describing the office as reactive to complaints. Deputy Inspector General Matt Neal detailed the OIG’s intake and triage process and said investigators use evidence‑based methods and seek to corroborate claims before issuing public reports.

On records access, Cummings told the committee that since January 23 the OIG has lost some prior direct access to certain city systems and now frequently uses subpoenas to obtain materials. "I have 20 open subpoenas right now," she said, adding that the loss of direct access hampers the office’s ability to protect whistleblowers and to monitor databases in‑house.

Council members sought clarity about how often the OIG initiates proactive inquiries, what constitutes "direct access" in practice, and what search approvals look like. Neal described technical workflows: OIG investigators submit narrowly tailored search requests (time period, subject, systems) that are approved and logged; the office uses forensic tools and keyword searches rather than open‑ended fishing expeditions. He also noted training and fraud‑examiner certifications for investigators.

Committee members made formal information requests: aggregate breakdowns of the 800 hotline complaints by agency and type (while protecting PHI), examples or redacted templates of signed search requests, and MONSEY evaluations from 2023 forward. The IG said she could provide a blank template for search sign‑offs but cautioned that completed investigative search forms and active investigatory materials are typically withheld for confidentiality and to avoid harming reputations or interfering with possible disciplinary or legal proceedings.

Why it matters: The OIG’s access to records and the scope of its investigative tools determines how effectively it can identify and stop waste, fraud and abuse in city government. Council members described the issue as central to oversight and requested follow‑up briefings and materials ahead of the next budget cycle.