Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board votes to repeal comprehensive-plan ordinance on first reading; staff recommends adopting plan by resolution

Board of Mayor and Aldermen · April 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board voted 5-2 on first reading to repeal the existing comprehensive-plan ordinance and discussed adopting the 2045 plan as a resolution to avoid the binding legal weight of an ordinance; staff recommended adopting by resolution and returning with the required consecutive votes.

The Board of Mayor and Aldermen debated whether to treat the city's 2045 comprehensive plan as an ordinance or a resolution and on April 27 voted on a repeal of the existing ordinance on first reading.

Planning staff and the city attorney explained that while a comprehensive plan can be adopted via ordinance, many municipalities now adopt plans by resolution to avoid creating binding legal obligations that an ordinance can imply. "When you pass it as a resolution, it's endorsed by the board, but it does not become binding," city legal counsel said during the discussion, adding that cities the staff reviewed commonly adopt comprehensive plans by resolution.

Board members expressed differing views: some favored keeping the plan as an ordinance to make the plan harder to alter, while others favored the flexibility of a resolution and the legal protections it provides. After discussion, the board voted 5-2 on first reading to repeal the current ordinance; staff advised the board they could adopt the plan by resolution at the next meeting and that procedural steps require a repeal by ordinance completed on two readings.

City staff said they would circulate the research on other cities' approaches and that a second reading and a companion resolution could occur in a subsequent meeting to avoid a gap in guidance.