Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Human Rights Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Human Rights Commission asks council to back enforcement ordinance to address local discrimination
Summary
The Human Rights Commission presented a proposal to expand from advisory functions to enforcement powers consistent with Virginia code, citing intake statistics and consultations with other Virginia localities and state attorneys; commissioners said additional staffing would be required to implement enforcement.
Samantha Galena, chair of Richmond’s Human Rights Commission, and vice chair Emily Wulftecke presented the commission’s recent work and a draft enforcement ordinance that would move the commission from an advisory role to an enforcement-capable body.
Galena told the committee the commission has three committees—community engagement, research and policy development, and intake and investigation—and has expanded outreach and intake in the past year. She said roughly 70 percent of inquiries so far have fallen within the city’s jurisdiction, with employment, law enforcement, disability and race among the most common subject areas.
On the proposed enforcement ordinance, Galena said the commission reviewed Virginia code and enforcement ordinances from other jurisdictions, met with city attorneys and the deputy attorney general’s public advocacy division, and drafted an ordinance that would allow investigatory, conciliation and enforcement recommendations “consistent with the Virginia code.” She cited the Virginia Human Rights Act and specific code sections the commission examined.
In response to council questions, Galena said current practice is to refer complaints to state and federal agencies (for example, the EEOC for employment complaints and HUD for housing claims) and to connect residents to legal aid and other resources. She said the proposed ordinance would include staffing thresholds and that the commission hopes to expand from part‑time to full‑time staffing as capacity and funding allow.
Committee members asked whether noncitizen residents would be covered; Galena said the applicable Virginia code sections include protections for residents of the Commonwealth and would cover noncitizen residents. Members asked about precedent in other localities; Galena cited enforcement ordinances in Northern Virginia jurisdictions and noted Charlottesville’s recent ordinance work as an example. The commission offered to provide additional details and to coordinate with city attorneys as the draft ordinance advances.
