Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Retiree Benefits topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council clarifies one‑time 1% COLA‑equivalent payment for retirees, estimates $716,000 cost

Richmond City Council · April 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Richmond City Council budget work session, members clarified a payment described in media as a 'bonus' is a one‑time payment equivalent to a 1% COLA for current retirees; staff estimated the cost at about $716,000 and council directed staff to pursue a long‑term COLA funding solution.

The Richmond City Council on Thursday clarified that a payment earmarked for current retirees is a one‑time payment equivalent to a 1% cost‑of‑living adjustment, not a recurring 'bonus.' Councilwoman Trammell pressed city staff to correct media reports and insisted the payment be described as a COLA, not a bonus.

"It is not a bonus. This is a COLA," Councilwoman Trammell said during the work session, pressing staff to ensure retirees and constituents understand the distinction. Council Chief of Staff RJ Warren confirmed council's intent, describing the measure as a one‑time payment that equals the amount a 1% COLA would deliver for this year.

Warren told the council the one‑time payment would deliver "the same amount as a 1% COLA" for recipients this year, and staff estimated the payment would cost about $716,000 to implement in the current fiscal year. Warren emphasized the council still must find a long‑term financing approach if it wants a recurring COLA beyond the current year.

The exchange resolved on direction to convene further discussions with the retirement system and administration to seek a permanent COLA mechanism. Council members said they remain committed to providing ongoing adjustments but need to identify sustainable funding sources before committing to a recurring COLA.

The council did not take a formal recorded vote at the work session; members instructed council staff and administration to draft any necessary budget amendments and return language for the formal meeting.