Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District presents MTSS discipline framework and reports drop in suspension rates
Summary
District staff outlined a three‑tier MTSS approach to behavior and academics, emphasized alternatives to suspension and restorative practices, and reported suspension rates declining to about 2.9% (531 suspensions) in 2023–24 with zero expulsions that year and early reporting showing one expulsion in 2024–25.
District leaders presented an overview of discipline policies and a multi‑tiered system of supports (MTSS) at the Nov. 12 board meeting, emphasizing prevention, data‑driven interventions and alternatives to suspension.
Dr. Gitanda (introduction) and Lisa Kirk described a three‑tier model: Tier 1 universal supports (school‑wide expectations, family engagement, safe and civil schools training), Tier 2 targeted interventions (small‑group counseling, daily check‑ins, personalized behavior contracts), and Tier 3 intensive individualized supports. Principals from Tanner and Jackson described specific campus practices such as ROAR behavior matrices, wellness centers, scheduled breaks, and advisory‑based intervention studios.
The presentation stressed alignment with the California Education Code and the district’s updated discipline handbook, which outlines investigation steps and a range of possible outcomes. Staff reported that the district’s 2023–24 suspension rate was 2.9 percent (531 suspensions) with zero expulsions for that year. By contrast, early reporting for 2024–25 showed one expulsion; staff said they expect updated dashboard figures to be released soon.
Board member Yesenia Carrenta and others praised the work and asked for continued monitoring of subgroup disparities. Staff acknowledged that some subgroups — foster youth, long‑term English learners and white students — remained in less favorable categories on the California School Dashboard and said the district will continue targeted MTSS work and leadership team support.
Why it matters: The district framed MTSS and alternatives to suspension as efforts to reduce exclusionary discipline and keep students engaged in learning, while the data presented show measurable reductions in suspensions but persistent subgroup disparities.
What’s next: Staff said they will continue data analysis, expand training for administrators on investigations and discipline procedures, and share updated dashboard numbers when available. Board members requested site visits to observe universal access and intervention practices.
Attribution: Presentation and data points were provided by district staff including Dr. Gitanda, Lisa Kirk, principals Belkie McConnell and Kelly Anderson, and Dr. Jones; board questions and comments were recorded from board members including Yesenia Carrenta.
