Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Levee Rehabilitation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants present Army Corps‑based cost estimate; levee study urges federal partners and local coordination
Summary
Consultants told trustees that updating the Army Corps' 2009 levee reevaluation produced present‑day construction-cost estimates showing continued need for rehabilitation and potential for federal cost‑share (roughly 65% federal/35% local); trustees pressed about FEMA maps, local flooding, and who would shoulder sponsorship and long‑term maintenance.
A village consultant told the Board of Trustees that a recent review of Army Corps materials and a local condition assessment indicate the Albuquerque East levee is not improving on its own and that a rehabilitation project should move forward.
The consultant said staff used the Corps' 2009 reevaluation as the baseline and updated those line items to present‑day values rather than recreating the Corps' detailed estimates, adding contingencies for design, land/takings and environmental uncertainties. He said replacing a long tow‑drain segment produced a cost only modestly lower than entirely rebuilding the levee in places because of scale and related damages/land costs.
Why it matters: The study gives local governments a current cost estimate to bring the levee to a certified standard and frames potential funding conversations. Consultants noted one likely path is federal participation with a typical Corps cost‑share structure — frequently cited as about 65% federal and 35% local — and suggested local sponsors coordinate on a cost‑share approach and with the congressional delegation.
Trustees pressed several operational questions. Trustee Edwards asked whether inaction could change FEMA floodplain mapping; consultant Mike Green (a former Army Corps levee safety official) replied that the study alone would not change FEMA maps — that would require updated hydraulic/hydrologic and geotechnical work — but agreed that failing to act could change floodplain conditions over time. Green summarized the study conclusion plainly: “The levee is not getting better by itself.”
Next steps: Consultants said they would finalize their report, share it with potential local sponsors (interstate stream commission, county, other municipalities) and the levy task force, and suggested that the report could form the basis of a legislative proposal to seek federal funding. Trustees signaled interest in discussing cost‑share options and phasing to spread costs over multiple fiscal years.
