Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surveying topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trenton members warn of inconsistent town surveys; advise survey if outbuilding nears property line
Summary
Members discussed that older town survey stakes may be inaccurate, noted an example corner post 'off 86 feet,' and said applicants should consider a formal survey if an outbuilding will sit close to a property line because surveys add cost and affect placement.
Members discussed inconsistencies in older town surveys and the practical consequences for placing sheds or outbuildings near property lines, and advised that applicants consider getting a formal survey if their structure would be close to a neighbor's boundary. "Maybe have to have a survey done or something," the Chair said when members raised the prospect of building within about 50 feet of a property line.
A committee member said older town survey stakes sometimes differ, and suggested the town should look at how other communities handle such discrepancies. "Some survey stakes were in the wrong spot," S2 said, noting that different surveys can show different boundary lines. The Chair added a concrete example of an error: a corner post found to be "off 86 feet," prompting discussion of gradually moving fence lines to match corrected survey corners.
One member described their own building experience to underscore the range of local practice: "You can build right on your line. Right. And your roof could even hang over the fence," S3 said, speaking from past construction experience. Members agreed that surveys add cost to projects and that neighbor agreements can sometimes be used but carry risks if ownership changes later. The meeting recorded no formal decision to change local survey policy; the conversation remained advisory and procedural.
