Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Bend Estates residents press Rowlett council to repair screening wall, criticize code enforcement letters
Summary
Multiple Lake Bend Estates residents told the Rowlett City Council the city-owned screening wall is deteriorated and that code enforcement letters urging repairs have alarmed elderly homeowners; residents urged city action, design consistency and consideration of a 50/50 funding approach.
Several residents from Lake Bend Estates told the Rowlett City Council on Sept. 16 that a long, city‑owned screening wall along Dalrock Road is in poor condition and that recent code‑enforcement notices have alarmed elderly homeowners.
Alan Hogan, a long‑time neighborhood resident, described conversations with neighbors who said the city sent letters threatening liens and enforcement action over the condition of the wall. "The city has been harassing her for years about this wall," Hogan said, describing elderly homeowners who were frightened by notices and who felt they were forced to remove debris to avoid enforcement.
Tamara Hess said the wall provides safety, noise reduction and aesthetic benefits for the neighborhood and questioned why funds that historically supported screening‑wall upkeep were not being used. "Why has there been specific line item budgets given to the upkeep of agreed upon screening walls for over 35 years and that budget is now not being utilized for this purpose? Where is that money?" Hess asked.
Patrick Bridal encouraged a solution that preserves consistent appearance along major streets, suggesting that if the city proceeds with a wood fence program it consider 50/50 cost participation and require pickets facing the street for a uniform look.
Resident Ron Manns asked the council to clarify whether corner lots and small parcels would be included in any city plan or left as separate homeowner responsibilities, warning that fragmented ownership could lead to inconsistent results.
Mayor (presiding) replied that staff had already acted to extend timelines with code enforcement after hearing resident concerns: "As soon as I heard about that ... I contacted our city manager and we have extended, or he has reached out to code enforcement about extending all those timelines," the mayor said.
What council did next: council members asked staff to bring back a CIP update and confirmed they would continue work on the screening‑wall issue; no formal ordinance or direct funding commitment was made at the Sept. 16 meeting.
