Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tip Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
TAC approves TIP amendment to add Charlotte rail bridge work, members press for broader repairs
Summary
The Transportation Advisory Committee approved a TIP amendment to add the Charlotte Rail Bridge over Thorpe Brook (related to Amtrak service extension), while members urged addressing eroding embankments, an undersized culvert, and unclear railroad/stormwater responsibilities. The motion passed with one abstention.
The Chittenden County Transportation Advisory Committee on Oct. 5 approved a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) amendment to include the Charlotte Rail Bridge over Thorpe Brook as part of work tied to the Amtrak extension to Burlington. The committee recorded concerns about eroding embankments and a culvert that members said is undersized for current stormwater needs.
VTrans requested inclusion of the project in the TIP as committee members discussed whether the amendment should be treated as a straightforward repair or as an opportunity to pursue more comprehensive improvements to the embankment, culvert, and drainage. Committee members noted that replacing the culvert was estimated at about $570,000, while replacing the crossing with a full structure would likely cost more than $2 million — an amount VTrans does not have in the current program. Members said Western Corridor earmark funds might be a potential source for larger work.
Committee discussion also touched on roles and responsibilities: members flagged the need to clarify railroad compliance with stormwater requirements and who would press the railroad to fund any necessary upgrades. The TAC recorded a procedural approval of the amendment but asked staff to continue making people aware of the broader erosion and drainage issues.
Sam Andersen moved that the TAC approve the proposed TIP amendments; Robin Pierce seconded. The motion passed with Andrea Morgante recorded as abstaining.
The committee did not adopt a funding plan for the larger structural options during the meeting; next steps recorded in the minutes indicate staff will continue outreach and that members may pursue other funding avenues for a more comprehensive remedy.
