Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planned Development Reserve Rowlett Shores topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission considers and moves to recommend planned development for 'Reserve at Rowlett Shores' after lengthy public comment
Summary
The commission reviewed a planned-development rezoning for 5.14 acres at or near 3917 Chizza/Sheesah Road to allow 28 single-family homes (PD with SF‑5 base). The proposal drew extensive public opposition over density, traffic, setbacks and drainage; the commission moved to approve the PD request with SF‑5 base zoning, though the transcript does not include a numerical vote tally.
The Rowlett City Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed a request to amend the comprehensive plan and rezone roughly 5.14 acres near Chizza/Sheesah Road from low-density single-family (SF‑40) to a planned development with an SF‑5 base, and to approve a concept plan for 28 single-family homes.
Staff described the application and enumerated requested deviations: a reduction in lot depth and rear setbacks (to 10 feet), a proposed 50-foot right-of-way in lieu of 60 feet, alley waivers and a potential allowance for limited third-story/roof-deck elements. Staff said notices were mailed and a small number of returns were received in favor and in opposition.
Applicant representatives presented the project as "Reserve at Rowlett Shores," emphasizing owner-occupied product, masonry facades, a small common green space and a site-driven need for PD exceptions because the parcel is long and narrow. The civil engineer and developer explained average lot sizes would be roughly 5,000–5,600 square feet and that the project seeks to provide for a walkable, low-maintenance product that they said fits the 2019/2020 comprehensive-plan goals for infill.
Residents (many nearby) strongly opposed the request in public comment. Common concerns included the change in density (several speakers contrasted the proposed dwelling units per acre with surrounding neighborhoods), the adequacy of Miller/Chiesa Road and local bridges to handle additional traffic, stormwater and drainage impacts from increased impervious surface, potential privacy impacts from two- to three‑story homes and a perceived pattern of requesting multiple deviations to fit more units on a constrained lot.
A nearby developer who built Canterbury Cove spoke in favor and argued the proposed density was similar to nearby development. Commissioners asked follow-up questions about lake access, green space and engineering provisions for drainage and emergency vehicle access.
A motion was made to approve the PD request with a zoning change to SF‑5; it received a second. The transcript records the chair calling for a vote and then moving on to the next agenda item; a numerical tally is not included in the excerpt provided.
Why it matters: The PD request would materially change allowable development intensity on this parcel and sets a precedent for how constrained infill properties may be developed in Rowlett. The proposal generated broad public pushback on infrastructure sequencing and neighborhood character.
Next steps: The transcript does not record a numerical roll call or final written recommendation text; as with other rezoning requests, the commission’s recommendation is advisory and any rezoning would require final action by the City Council.
