Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears EcoMaine fee increase and EPR timeline; town to absorb interim costs
Summary
Finance committee was told March 16 that EcoMaine raised recycling fees to equal municipal solid waste tipping rates (roughly $87 to $117 per ton), and that extended producer responsibility (EPR) revenue is expected to arrive later (staff cited October 2027) — leaving the town to carry higher disposal costs for now.
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The finance committee on March 16 discussed a near‑term spike in recycling costs after regional waste authority EcoMaine adjusted its rates and the prospect that extended producer responsibility (EPR) revenues will not offset that increase until later fiscal years.
Matt (town staff) said EcoMaine’s board voted to change its recycling rate to match municipal solid waste tipping fees, a move staff said raised the town’s recycling cost from about $87 per ton to about $117 per ton. Matt explained the change was deliberate and that the town will bear the higher expense this fiscal year as EcoMaine and the new EPR program establish billing and volume tracking.
“We went from 87 to a $117 per ton from recycling to on par with household… municipal solid waste,” Matt said. He added the new EPR program will start generating identifiable revenue for communities only after EcoMaine and the program have the necessary volume and accounting in place — staff estimated those reimbursements could be booked in fiscal year 2027 (staff cited an October 2027 correlation date).
Why it matters: committee members said recycling cost parity with MSW will raise collection budgets this year, even if EPR revenue is expected later. Staff explained that EcoMaine intends to capture volumes and later disburse reimbursements based on per‑community tonnage under the EPR scheme; until those flows appear the town must absorb higher tipping and recycling fees.
Councilors also discussed service tradeoffs: whether to continue town‑sponsored bulky‑item and e‑waste collection and confidential shredding (services residents favor), or to consider modest user fees to offset $32,500 currently budgeted for “other waste collection.” Staff said bulky‑item and shredding programs are popular and can be politically sensitive to remove, but agreed to follow up on fee and partnership options.
What’s next: staff said they will monitor EcoMaine actuals, report back on the EPR revenue timing and provide options for offsetting increased waste costs, including possible user fees or partnership arrangements.

