Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cedar Fort council flags fire-fund accounting discrepancy, discusses equipment needs and impact fees
Summary
Councilors probed a reported fire-fund balance of about $96,000 that staff said included budgeted and grant amounts while only ~$41,000 had been received; discussion also covered equipment repairs, estimated replacement costs and the need to update fire impact fees.
Cedar Fort — Town councilors pressed staff on the accounting and funding available for the volunteer fire department at the April 21 meeting, raising questions the council said will affect near-term equipment and budget decisions.
During budget review, a council member questioned whether the packet’s figure of approximately $96,000 remaining in the fire fund represented cash on hand. Treasurer Andrea Ashley responded that the higher figure included grant funds and budgeted allocations and that only about $41,000 had actually been received; roughly $47,000 remained unspent in budgeted accounts, she said.
The discrepancy prompted discussion about how budget reports are presented and whether adjustments or a year-end budget amendment are needed. Staff told the council budget categories can be adjusted and that some unspent funds may carry over depending on fund type.
Fire Chief Kale Black outlined multiple apparatus issues: a rescue truck with electrical problems, pending tender door repairs, an engine called “Crimson” requiring repair, and brush trucks that need pump replacement or upgrades. He gave rough cost figures: about $60,000 for a chassis and a wide range of $70,000 to $400,000 for brush trucks, noting the department should maintain existing equipment before pursuing expansion.
Council members also discussed impact fees for fire services and the urgency of updating the town’s study to ensure fees align with current development. The Council reached consensus to table a discussion on an Assistant Chief’s wage until a broader volunteer-compensation structure can be developed.
The council did not vote on these policy items but approved related operational purchases, and staff said the town intends to pursue grant funding and funding solutions, including exploring sales-tax options that are limited by state eligibility rules. The council agreed to revisit these budget and policy issues at a future meeting.
