Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aberdeen board adopts technical zoning corrections to remove references to incomplete development guide
Summary
The board approved zoning text amendment TA-2602 to remove or correct UDO references to a partly finished 'development guide,' after planning staff said the changes align the ordinance with current practices and the planning board recommended unanimous approval.
The Town of Aberdeen Board of Commissioners voted April 27 to adopt zoning text amendment TA-2602, a set of technical corrections to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) that removes references to material in the town's development guide that does not yet exist.
Planning staff told the board the amendment fixes references in multiple chapters — including chapters 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 — so users of the UDO are not directed to guidance that isn't available. Planning staff said the development guide is intended as a nonregulatory "user guide" to help applicants but that many referenced chapters were never completed, creating dead links and confusion for applicants.
"We just don't want users to look for something that's not there at this stage," planning staff said during the public hearing, noting the planning board had reviewed the package and issued a unanimous recommendation for approval.
The amendment leaves existing regulatory standards in the UDO intact while removing or revising cross-references that pointed users to the incomplete development guide. In cases where technical standards exist elsewhere, the amendment adds a clear pointer to the public works standards and specifications rather than the development guide.
After no members of the public asked to speak during the hearing, a commissioner moved to adopt the land-use plan consistency statement prepared by staff and then moved to approve TA-2602. The motions passed on voice votes.
What happens next: staff said the town will continue drafting additional development-guide chapters and may return to the board in future when a completed chapter merits re-inclusion in the UDO. For now, the ordinance change is intended to reduce confusion for applicants and bring the UDO into better alignment with existing public works and planning practice.
Sources: Planning staff presentation and the board's vote at the April 27 regular meeting.
