Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Business Permitting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges limits on bars near homes; owner of Silver Silo asks for fair, non-retroactive review
Summary
A White County resident urged commissioners to limit beer-sales businesses near homes after a building converted to a bar; the owner of the Silver Silo said no official violation was found and asked the commission to consider policy changes carefully and avoid retroactive application.
During the public-comment portion of the White County Commission meeting, resident Carrie Presley told commissioners that a nearby property recently converted to a bar and event space, bringing constant noise, shipping-container movement, bright lights, and traffic-safety concerns at a blind curve on Route 70. Presley said about 290 White County residents had signed a petition asking the county to limit such businesses from operating so close to homes.
"Our once peaceful retirement home was now behind a bar," Presley said, describing loud daytime construction activity and evening entertainment she said had made living conditions untenable. She asked the commission to "limit these types of businesses from operating so close to our homes" and to use zoning and permitting to keep such uses in downtown commercial areas rather than residential front yards.
Mason Knott, who identified himself as the owner of the Silver Silo, responded that to his knowledge no board or official had made a final finding that his business was operating in violation of the law. Knott asked the commission to treat any policy changes carefully so they would not be applied retroactively to an existing business that relied on the rules in place when investments were made. "If the county wants to discuss future policy, I respect that process, but I would ask that such policy be considered carefully, applied fairly, and not used to single out one's existing business," Knott said.
Chair announced he had requested that the county's current beer-permitting rules be added to the April agenda for review to determine whether any changes are needed in response to the public requests. The commission did not take immediate enforcement action or apply new restrictions at the meeting; instead, staff and commissioners scheduled a policy review at the next meeting.
Presley's petition and Knott's request for fairness set up a procedural next step: a review of beer-permitting rules in April. Commissioners and staff said they would use that session to examine existing permitting rules and any possible changes before any policy decision would be made.
