Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Map topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners debate institutional map labels and 65‑foot height for C‑265 station area

Village of Brookfield Planning & Zoning Commission · January 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission discussed whether to rezoned certain government/education parcels to an Institutional District and whether a proposed 65‑foot height for the C‑265 (Congress Station) subdistrict should be reduced along blocks that back onto single‑family neighborhoods; staff agreed to refine the map and return with options.

Commissioners spent substantial time on map details and the proposed C‑265 subdistrict.

Staff recommended rezoning many governmental and educational parcels to a new Institutional District and showed how station areas would convert to the new commercial and downtown districts. Commissioners asked whether key sites (Madeline Park, SC Gross Middle School, the post office) should be shown as Institutional or left as permitted uses in residential/downtown districts; staff said those uses remain permitted and that adding institutional designations was possible if the commission preferred clearer labeling.

The largest map dispute centered on the proposed 65‑foot height allowed in the C‑265 subdistrict near Ogden Avenue. Staff said the increase from 45 to 65 feet was proposed to support transit‑oriented development near the train station. Several commissioners worried that allowing 65 feet on parcels that back directly onto single‑family neighborhoods would change neighborhood character and suggested limiting the 65‑foot allowance to the core blocks adjacent to the station while reducing the shallow 'knuckle' lots to 45 feet.

Staff response and next steps: Arista agreed to review the specific blocks commissioners flagged and to return with options that could keep higher heights near the core station area while stepping down along lots that immediately back onto single‑family districts.