Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council rejects resolution supporting municipal medical director after debate over costs and confusion
Summary
Council debated and then rejected a resolution that would have supported municipal medical directors to oversee prehospital emergency care; supporters said it would expand training opportunities, while opponents called it a potential 'Trojan horse' that could create duplication and costs. The motion failed on a roll call vote (2 yes, 3 no).
Get email alerts on the Public Health Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Crossville council voted down a resolution intended to support municipal medical directors for prehospital emergency care, after councilors and public speakers warned it could create confusion and unanticipated costs.
A council member who moved the resolution said it would allow Crossville Fire Rescue medics to be trained and accountable to a practicing clinical director and said it would not require additional paramedic personnel or new vehicles. “This ability ... could afford encounters for our prehospital emergency care providers to observe in clinical settings and adopt advanced life saving skills,” the mover said.
Opponents argued the measure could be duplicative, costly and confusing. One councilor characterized the proposal as a “Trojan horse,” warning it would create two medical directors and raise questions about handoffs in care. The mayor warned that most medical directors expect compensation and benefits. “It will cost money because I don't know of any medical director that works for free,” the mayor said, noting potential stipends, benefits and vehicle requests.
After discussion, the motion failed on roll call (the clerk recorded two votes in favor and three opposed). Council members asked the city attorney to ensure existing memoranda of understanding and procedures between the city, EMS and fire department remain in effect.
What’s next: Council did not adopt the resolution; if proponents wish to pursue similar authority, the item will need revision and further council consideration.
