Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Expo Center Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners approve schematic design for Lubbock County Expo Center after tense debate

Lubbock County Commissioners Court · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The court voted 4–1 to support commissioning Park Hill Architects to produce a schematic design for a downsized Expo Center on an ~80-acre North University site, with LCEC funding the $375,000 schematic; commissioners pressed LCEC for proof of full construction funding and auditor access to financial records before any further county obligation.

Lubbock County Commissioners on Jan. 27 approved a resolution authorizing the Lubbock County Expo Center (LCEC) and Park Hill Architects to prepare a schematic design for a proposed Expo Center on roughly 80 acres along North University Avenue and the North Loop 289 access road. The resolution passed 4–1 after months of planning and a heated exchange over funding and county exposure.

The schematic-phase agreement calls for LCEC to pay a lump-sum $375,000 for schematic design work; the county will not be obligated to further expenditures absent future approval, LCEC representatives said. “We’ve got a plan that is, affordable, a plan that’s workable,” LCEC representative Mr. Jordan told the court, urging commissioners to allow the design work to proceed so the corporation could present more detailed plans later.

Why it matters: Voters approved venue tax funding in 2018 and prior county actions and tax collections have produced roughly $15 million LCEC reports as available for the project; commissioners worried that previously spent venue-tax dollars (appearing in the budget as about $7.7 million for early work) and future construction costs could leave the county liable if private funding fell short.

Several commissioners pressed for stronger taxpayer protections and clearer documentation of how earlier venue-tax receipts were spent. County Auditor Kathy Williams told the court she had received some audits and tax documents but said she still lacked a full multi-year ledger. “I have asked for these things,” Williams said, noting the auditor needs financial records to evaluate the private-public partnership.

The District Attorney’s civil division told the court it had worked with LCEC and planned to coordinate a review of donor pledges and LCEC financials before the design is finalized. A DA representative said the intent is to ensure the county has confidence in any future requests for additional county money and noted the county is statutorily constrained by the voter-approved venue tax.

Several commissioners proposed amendments that would have required LCEC to demonstrate full construction funding before the court affirms the site; those amendments failed for lack of a second. Commissioners and LCEC representatives said the schematic approach is intended to produce a firm design and funding plan to return to the court in a few months.

The vote: Motion to approve the resolution carried 4–1. Commissioners were recorded as supporting the resolution after extensive discussion; the court recorded one dissenting vote.

Next steps: Park Hill will begin the schematic design if LCEC follows through with the $375,000 payment. LCEC and the DA’s office agreed to supply additional financial documentation and work with county auditors; the court expects a formal presentation of the schematic and fundraising details in the coming months.