Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County agrees formula to cover post‑judgment property sale losses, to use contingency account
Summary
After staff reported one auctioned parcel yielded a surplus and another will sell at a loss, the committee agreed on a contingency‑fund approach to cover post‑judgment sale losses net of municipal reimbursements and asked staff to return with policy language; committee consensus was 5‑0.
Get email alerts on the Finance Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff told the Personnel & Finance Committee that a recent auction produced a small surplus (about $2,500) but that another property will likely sell at a loss. To address post‑judgment sale costs (utility bills, lawn and snow removal, appraisals, recording fees), staff has established a liability account to record these expenses and proposed that a contingency fund cover net losses after municipal reimbursement.
The presenting staff member said the county will bill municipalities for their share of special assessments where applicable; in a recent example staff said the city covered $19,000 of a $20,000 loss on a prior property, leaving the county exposure limited to the county's tax share. Supervisors discussed setting a reserve amount and using a contingency account so losses do not repeatedly flow through operating budgets.
Supervisors agreed on a practical formula for tracking and handling losses, asked staff to bring back a formal usage policy for the Opportunity/contingency fund and voted to proceed by consensus (5‑0). Staff said they will return next month with more detailed numbers and policy language.
