Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Replat topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve Meadowbrook Acres replat despite neighbor objections
Summary
Kaufman County Commissioners approved a replat for Lot 2 in Meadowbrook Acres after a legal review showed the deed restriction for that lot had been lifted and filed; nearby residents warned the change could trigger further subdivisions.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Replat topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kaufman County Commissioners on Feb. 3 voted to approve a replat of Lot 2 in Meadowbrook Acres, allowing the property owner to subdivide the lot into parcels of about 1.5 acres each despite objections from at least one neighbor.
The action came after planning staff said the replat met subdivision regulations and had been reviewed by approving authorities. Neighbor Link Thompson said he opposed the change because ‘‘they're changing the restrictions that’s been in place for over 40 years’’ and warned of a ‘‘domino effect’’ of further subdivisions that would alter the character of the area.
Assistant District Attorney Mark Guthrie told the court that the deed restriction for the specific lot had been lawfully amended: ‘‘A majority of the owners decided to lift it, and it's been lifted’’ and the change was filed in county records, which—he said—legally permits the lot to be subdivided. County staff also said notices were mailed and advertisements run consistent with Texas local government code procedures.
Planning staff noted the revised lots are about 1.5 acres and ‘‘can only have one home and one septic’’; they said the replat had met subdivision requirements and the county had not received any indication other lots in the subdivision would be replotted at this time. Jesus Gomez, a nearby resident who spoke in favor of addressing concerns, provided his address for the record.
After discussion, a commissioner moved to approve the replat, another seconded, and the court approved the motion by voice vote.
The court record shows the legal determination focused on whether the procedural steps to amend the restrictive covenant for Lot 2 had been followed and filed in the deed records; commissioners noted the county's role is limited to assessing whether the change infringes on owners’ rights beyond the legal record. There was no formal appeal or specific mitigation condition announced during the meeting.
Next steps: The replat is approved as filed; any further changes to other lots would require separate filings and approvals.
