Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hays County health department lays out animal‑services plan; court pauses Kyle interlocal for incoming city leaders
Summary
The county’s new Animal Welfare Services division briefed commissioners on a county–municipal approach to a regional animal services campus in Kyle, pilot TNR work with PALS and West‑side satellite planning; commissioners agreed to table the interlocal agreement with Kyle and Buda so new city leadership can review it.
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Matthew Gonzales, director of the Hays County Health Department, told the commissioners the county created an Animal Welfare Services division in April and has implemented staff hires, community programs and pilot initiatives while pursuing shelter facility options.
Gonzales summarized two options from the Team Shelter USA feasibility study and later Broadus recommendations: a county‑led standalone facility with satellites, or a municipality‑led primary campus with county partners. He said the court chose the municipality‑led option and has a memorandum of understanding with the City of Kyle signed in September 2025 to pursue a Kyle main campus and a West‑side satellite in Dripping Springs; operations and programming for the Kyle facility would be provided by the city while cost‑sharing for design and construction would be proportionate among partners.
Gonzales detailed outcomes from recent county efforts: 17 community events since June, microchip and low‑cost veterinary clinics, a targeted trap‑neuter‑return pilot at Saddle Brook with partner PALS, and a focus on food‑pantry distribution to households in need. He also reviewed PIT‑count data (presented earlier by health department staff): countywide PIT count of 187 people in 2025, including 55 unsheltered and 132 sheltered, with most counts in San Marcos.
Commissioners pressed for written and enforceable standards to ensure programming, no‑kill or ‘‘live‑outcome’’ goals, and consistent operational practices across the Kyle campus and any county‑contracted satellites. Commissioner Smith asked how the county would guarantee that staffing, program availability and best practices mirror those at the Kyle facility; Gonzales said the county plans partnership meetings and mirrored contract language to align standards across sites.
Judge Becerra’s animal‑welfare advisor Shari Moyad urged comprehensive cost accounting, clarity on Kyle’s commitments (including no‑kill/program metrics), and establishment of a coalition of nonprofit and municipal stakeholders. Moyad asked for dollar limits and clearer commitments in the interlocal agreement.
When asked by Judge Becerra, county staff confirmed design and procurement work could continue administratively while the court considered whether to act on a formal interlocal agreement. At the court’s request, county staff agreed to brief incoming Kyle and Buda leadership before finalizing the interlocal terms.
The court agreed to table formal action on K21 (the interlocal agreement between Hays County, the City of Kyle and the City of Buda) to allow the newly elected city leadership time to review the draft agreement; the tabling was recorded by roll call and will return on the next court cycle. In the meantime, Gonzales said the county will continue planning, community listening sessions and implementation work contingent on available funding.
