Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jail Feasibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advocates press court over jail feasibility studies and vendor relationships; some urge non-carceral alternatives
Summary
During public comment, family members and advocates criticized the county's approach to jail planning, questioned contracts with particular vendors, and urged investment in community-based mental-health and non-carceral solutions rather than expanding jail capacity.
Public commenters at the Feb. 12 Harris County Commissioners Court urged the county to prioritize non-carceral approaches, raised concerns about contracting and vendor selection for proposed jail feasibility studies, and called for clearer commitments about what would happen to existing facilities should new capacity be built.
Family members of people who died in custody and advocates said past recommendations and outside studies have not been implemented and warned that new construction risks merely increasing capacity and filling it. One speaker specifically criticized a vendor (identified in public comment as CGL) for past operational and legal allegations; county purchasing noted that complaints on record fell outside the five-year window used in procurement vetting and said references had been checked.
Advocates pressed the court to pair any feasibility work on new facilities with simultaneous, concrete plans to reduce existing jail usage through community programs and diversion. Commissioners and staff said the procurement and joint governance advisory committee (JGAC) selected consultant teams to produce interdependent carceral and non-carceral studies, and that staff expect preliminary recommendations in 8-9 months with final recommendations in 12-18 months.
The court voted to proceed with two parallel planning contracts (carceral and non-carceral), but some commissioners and members of the public asked for more immediate, actionable measures to reduce jail populations. County purchasing and administration said they would continue due diligence and report back to the court.
