Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve non-binding MOU to pursue Houston Texans practice-facility and economic district near Bridgeland
Summary
Harris County voted to authorize a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the Houston Texans and Howard Hughes Corp. to negotiate a practice facility/headquarters and related district in northwest Harris County, promising prioritized local hiring and infrastructure commitments to be spelled out in later definitive agreements.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Harris County Commissioners Court voted unanimously on Feb. 12 to authorize a non-binding memorandum of understanding (MOU) that lays out a framework for a public-private partnership between Harris County, the Houston Texans and the Howard Hughes Corporation for a planned practice facility/headquarters and surrounding economic district in northwest Harris County.
Commissioner Briones, who moved the item, described the MOU as a first step that will be translated into definitive agreements to be returned to the court for approval. "This public-private partnership will be game changing," Briones said, listing goals that commissioners cited on the record: local hiring prioritization, apprenticeship and internship opportunities, trails and parks, and infrastructure to support a growth corridor.
Commissioner Ramsey, who co-led discussions on the initiative, called the project "bodacious" and emphasized its long-term potential to accelerate roads, mobility and economic development in a rapidly growing part of the county. The motion approved authorizes the Office of County Administration to execute the non-binding MOU and continue negotiations; commissioners emphasized public funding will be subject to existing county policies and worker-wage requirements.
Commissioner Ellis asked for—and received—assurances that the MOU is aspirational and that any future abatements, fiscal commitments or general-fund outlays will be presented for court review. Commissioners also signaled they expect a representative from each commissioner's office involved in the drafting of any definitive agreement.
The court recorded unanimous support; staff said the MOU will be followed by more detailed negotiations on the project'including any requests for incentives, infrastructure spending and community benefits agreements—which will be returned to the court for final approval.
