Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

FDOT briefed council on signalized pedestrian crosswalk at NE 124th Street and NE 15th Avenue; item approved

City of North Miami City Council · April 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Florida DOT presented a federally funded pedestrian-signal project on NE 124th Street that will remove five parking spaces, add a signal and pedestrian lighting, and last about 180 days; council approved the off‑system agreement 5–0 after questions about access, outreach and night work.

The council approved an off‑system construction and maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation to install a signalized pedestrian crosswalk on Northeast 124th Street just east of 15th Avenue.

FDOT project staff explained the work will include a full traffic signal with pedestrian activation, additional pedestrian lighting, and excavation/drilling to install a signal structure and a concrete utility pole to connect power from an FPL service point. The project manager said the scope will require removing five parking spaces on the north side of the road to improve sight distance for drivers making left turns onto 15th Avenue.

FDOT estimated the construction window at about 180 days, with most lane closures occurring overnight; staff said at least one travel lane will remain open and that pedestrian detours and property access will be maintained. The agency indicated the project is largely funded by FDOT (the presentation stated approximately $376,000) and that the department will work with the city on outreach, a public meeting for affected businesses and residences, and ongoing coordination during construction.

Council members sought clarification about the pole location relative to a proposed driveway for an upcoming development; FDOT said the signal and pole were designed to preserve sidewalk width and not to block property access. The council asked about types of pedestrian signals (in‑pavement flashing lights versus full signal) and FDOT said the department is upgrading to a full signal because previous flashing installations showed limited driver compliance.

After questions, the council opened a public hearing, moved and seconded approval of Tab C, and the motion carried with a 5–0 recorded vote.