Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development And Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Benton City planners on street safety and sewer odor as staff outlines UGA delay
Summary
Neighbors raised safety and utility concerns about a proposed 6‑lot development and fences encroaching into the street; planning staff said duplexes would require a conditional use and urged residents to attend a council presentation. Staff and engineers said changes to the urban growth area are constrained by a state 'periodic update' and that sewer main replacement and grant work are being pursued.
Residents and nearby property owners told the Benton City Planning Commission they fear a planned small subdivision on 6th/3rd Street could change from single‑family houses to duplexes and exacerbate safety problems where fences and structures encroach into the roadway.
Adela Rangel, who said she lives on 307 East 9th Street and is building a house nearby, said neighbors were told utility workers were "measuring" for new service and that conversations suggested duplexes might replace the previously approved six single‑family lots. She described multiple fences that she said sit several feet into the street, creating hazards for vehicles and residents.
"I love Benton City, but we have the same compliance. All our side of the street is literally in compliance, but all the other side... is like 4 to 6 feet into the street," Rangel said, asking the commission to ensure rules are enforced and neighbors are notified about changes.
Vic Engelhart, who lives at 313 East 6th Street, presented a written letter from a neighbor and reported that utility staff had proposed placing a transformer or running lines across private yards; he urged the city to "stick to the ordinances and stick to getting things done right." Engelhart asked whether the utility pole on his property would be moved or whether he would be reimbursed for use of his land.
Planning staff (George) responded that the R‑2 zone allows single‑family residences and accessory dwelling units outright, but that "for a duplex, they will need a conditional use," and staff had not received any conditional‑use request for the site. Staff encouraged residents to attend a City Council presentation scheduled for the 29th where the 6th Street issue will be discussed.
On a separate but related topic, consulting engineer Alan Rainey reviewed a proposed urban growth area (UGA) map and said Benton County and the Department of Commerce had advised the city that some proposed removals from the UGA would not be permitted because the areas are already urban in character. Rainey said the Department of Commerce's periodic update grant rules restrict substantive UGA adjustments while the city is undertaking the current comp‑plan amendment and that staff expects the process to proceed through 2026 with final submissions to the county next year.
Public works director Nathan Radick addressed repeated complaints about a strong sewer odor in town and described the city's technical findings: staff and a consultant completed line cleaning and camera inspections and found many aging concrete sewer mains that need relining or full replacement. Radick said the city has applied for grants (including a Department of Ecology application) for targeted line replacement and is continuing to evaluate options. He advised residents to file formal complaints so the city has a documented record of incidents.
The commission requested copies of site maps and surveys to put into the record and asked staff to follow up on notification and enforcement options. Staff said they will continue to coordinate with the county, Department of Commerce, and utilities and will report back as the council and planning processes move forward.
