Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves variance to allow 680‑sq‑ft ADU at 718 12th Street
Summary
The Benton City Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve Variance 25‑02, allowing a 680‑square‑foot detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) with a 10‑foot rear setback on consolidated parcels at 718 12th Street. Staff said the request meets local variance criteria; neighbors raised no formal opposition.
Benton City planners approved Variance 25‑02 to allow a 680‑square‑foot detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) with a 10‑foot rear setback on a consolidated lot at 718 12th Street.
George, a planning staff member, told the commission the applicant, Kenneth Peters, has consolidated two roughly 8,100‑square‑foot parcels into a single 16,800‑square‑foot lot and is seeking a reduced rear setback from a 20‑foot alleyway to place the ADU. Staff cited Benton City Municipal Code, Title 2, Division 5, and recommended approval after finding the request met the variance criteria and would not adversely affect the comprehensive plan.
Amber Peters, who said she is representing her father, Kenneth, explained the household plan: "We're building the ADU for my parents to move into so that my husband, I, and my daughters will move into the existing house." She said the family hopes to retain usable yard area and intends to apply for required building permits for any proposed pool.
Staff noted one written communication from the irrigation district with no objections and said the PUD had not opposed the proposal. Building inspector Zach confirmed that a separate building permit and required safety fencing would be needed for a pool should the family pursue that option.
With no formal opposition in the hearing, Commissioner Gonzalez moved to adopt the findings and conclusions prepared by staff and approve Variance 25‑02; the motion was seconded and carried in a roll‑call vote. Commissioners McLeod, Thompson, Wallace and Lynn voted yes; the motion carried among members present.
The commission closed the public hearing after adopting the staff findings. The applicant will proceed with permit applications and any required administrative reviews for related work such as fencing and pool permits.
