Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Land‑use language would limit Act 250 review to development footprints, Land Use Review Board member says
Summary
A Land Use Review Board member told the Senate Natural Resources & Energy Committee that proposed H932 language would confine Act 250 jurisdiction to the areas supporting development — leaving the remainder of large forested tracts available for customary forestry — while preserving stream buffers and other permit conditions.
A member of the Land Use Review Board told the Senate Natural Resources & Energy Committee that proposed changes to Act 250 (in H932) are intended to limit jurisdictional review to the actual development footprint and the narrow supporting areas, so that ongoing forestry and logging on large tracts would not be swept into development regulation.
Brooke Dangoldine, who identified herself as a member of the Land Use Review Board, summarized the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
