Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Reading planners recommend transit‑oriented development overlay to City Council, ask staff to localize language
Summary
The Planning Commission recommended adoption of a county‑draft Transit‑Oriented Development (TOD) overlay and related zoning/subdivision amendments to the City Council and asked staff to simplify language, align definitions with local code, and prepare developer outreach.
The City of Reading Planning Commission voted April 28 to recommend that City Council adopt a Transit‑Oriented Development (TOD) overlay district and corresponding zoning and subdivision amendments prepared through a county consultant process.
Staff presented the final draft and described the substantive additions since the commission’s April 9 review: incentives for underground parking, clarified lighting and wayfinding provisions, and minor definitional edits. Jerome told commissioners the consultant’s version needs some local tailoring: "Ultimately, the proposed draft will be amended to personalize the zoning amendments to make it more cohesive with the rest of the City of Reading zoning ordinance." (Jerome)
Commissioners probed whether the incentives were sufficiently compelling to change developer behavior. One commissioner warned that without tangible takeaways the overlay could read as “nice words” rather than a decisive incentive: "If there is not a takeaway for a developer, then it's just nice words." That concern prompted a discussion of density and parking benefits, and whether to pair the overlay with marketing and coordination with existing economic tools (for example, CRIS maps and downtown grant programs).
The commission voted to recommend adoption to City Council with these directions for staff: finalize local edits to match Reading’s zoning language, prepare a summary for Council and public comment, and plan targeted outreach so prospective developers understand how to use the overlay’s incentives. Staff and commissioners also agreed to monitor developer feedback and adjust the overlay language if the provisions do not attract projects.
A public commenter thanked the commission for advancing TOD and adaptive reuse measures and urged prompt council action to support downtown revitalization.
Next steps: the commission forwarded the amendments to City Council for public hearing and requested staff return with proposed local edits and a developer‑facing guidance memo.
