Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission defers decision on $55,000 lien mitigation for 6437 SW 16th Street after debate
Summary
Administration reported a $55,000 mitigation offer to resolve more than $1,000,000 in code enforcement liens at a West Miami property; commissioners raised concerns the amount is too low and about which party bears future liability, and voted to defer negotiations for further work and to invite the buyer to attend.
City staff presented a mitigation/stipulation offer April 29 to settle code enforcement liens for the property at 6437 Southwest 16th Street. Administration said a buyer has offered to purchase the foreclosed property and proposed a $55,000 settlement with six months to secure permits and bring the property into compliance, after which the lien would be considered resolved; if the buyer fails to comply the full lien would be reinstated.
City Manager explained the property had an illegal addition and other violations, that the bank foreclosed and a new purchaser is prepared to submit plans and move the property toward compliance, and that staff negotiated the $55,000 figure as the buyer’s limit to close. "They are submitting the plans. They have six months to get it approved," the manager said.
Commissioner Gustavo Ceballos objected that the mitigation was too small relative to an approximately $1,000,000 lien and argued the city should not allow investors to profit from large liens; he recommended a higher settlement amount (he suggested $100,000). The mayor and other commissioners said they were sympathetic to preserving housing stock and expressed concern about saddling a new homeowner with the full legacy lien if construction delays occur.
City Attorney clarified that a lien runs with the property (in rem) and that the lien attaches to the real property rather than personal liability of a subsequent buyer; the manager and commissioners discussed negotiating further with the buyer and whether to invite the buyer to a future meeting.
After extended discussion the commission voted to defer the item so staff could renegotiate and return with the buyer present if available.
Why it matters: The item involved a heavily liened property with more than $1,000,000 in accumulated code fines and the commission wrestled with balancing enforcement of code penalties against getting a derelict property repaired and back into the housing stock.
What’s next: Staff will resume negotiations with the prospective buyer and return the matter to the commission; the commission asked for further detail on plans and financial capacity and the buyer was invited to attend the next meeting if possible.
