Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Overview topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Harrisburg workshop holds tax rate at 41¢; council keeps Greenway funding and boosts facade grant

Town of Harrisburg Council · May 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Town of Harrisburg budget workshop staff and councilors confirmed a freeze of the property tax rate at 41¢, kept the annual Greenway program at $250,000 with scope to return for project‑specific amendments, and signaled support to increase façade‑grant funding to $100,000; staff also proposed modest fee changes and a 5% water/sewer rate increase.

Town of Harrisburg staff presented the manager's recommended budget framework at a workshop where councilors voiced support for holding the property tax rate steady and for several targeted program adjustments.

Lee (speaker 5) summarized the council exercise results, reporting unanimous agreement to keep the property tax rate at 41¢ and to keep the solid‑waste fee at $10. Lee said, "So no changes were made by anyone here for those two, and that is how the budget is all built around." Rob (speaker 2) reiterated that the budget can be changed before adoption and reminded the council the next step is a public hearing and final adoption in June.

Major operating and program decisions reflected in staff presentations and council direction included:

- Tax rate and fees: Councilors supported freezing the property tax rate at 41¢ and keeping current solid‑waste and most other fees unchanged.

- Greenways: The annual Greenway program remains budgeted at $250,000. Staff presented two higher funding options — $300,000 (moderate support in the exercise) and $350,000 (strong denial) — and councilors asked staff to bring specific shovel‑ready projects back for consideration or to pursue amendments if a compelling opportunity appears.

- Façade grant: Council discussion favored increasing façade‑grant funding from a historical $50,000 to $100,000 to make the program more active; staff noted unspent amounts remain in an economic development capital reserve if not spent in the current year.

- Utility and fees: Staff proposed a 5% increase to water and sewer rates (attributed to higher underlying costs), a 0.5 percentage‑point increase to the credit‑card convenience fee, removal of the one‑time security deposit for new utility accounts and a reduction of the account setup fee (from $75 to $35). Parks resident fees remain unchanged; non‑resident sports fees were proposed to increase modestly.

Councilors also discussed programming issues, notably the town's relationship with Pop Warner football. Staff clarified that registration fees cover the program costs; some council members urged a planned, multi‑year transition to a community‑run model while others recommended keeping the current arrangement because it generates activity and visibility.

Financial outlook: Staff showed a 10‑year capital and operating model that keeps capital reserves positive under the current assumptions. Rob noted the model begins with a capital reserve balance "north of $20,000,000" and said projected reserves can fund a large pipeline of capital work while remaining healthy across the model horizon.

Next steps: Staff will incorporate tonight's feedback into the manager's recommended budget, present it at a public hearing on May 11 and accept public comment through the June 8 meeting when adoption is scheduled.