Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Irrigation Permit Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County orders halt, resubmittal deadlines for multiple after‑the‑fact irrigation systems
Summary
Alachua County environmental staff said Wawa and Celebration Point operate unapproved in‑ground irrigation systems installed before county approval; staff recommended discontinuing use until deficient applications are corrected and inspections passed, and sought administrative costs plus $100/day fines.
Alachua County environmental specialists told the magistrate that several commercial properties installed permanent in‑ground irrigation systems before filing or receiving county approval.
Rebecca Hoffman, a senior environmental specialist with the Alachua County Environmental Protection Department (ACEPD), said staff found unapproved permanent irrigation systems at a Wawa store on NW US‑441 and at Celebration Point. For both matters ACEPD staff recommended that respondents immediately discontinue use of the irrigation systems until the county approves corrected applications and inspections are completed. Hoffman requested seven days to resubmit corrected applications and urged registration of irrigation systems per county code. She also asked the magistrate to recover administrative costs (for example, $1,080.36 for the Wawa file and $780.26 for Celebration Point) and to impose a $100/day fine until compliance was achieved.
Respondatives disputed jurisdictional and procedural points. A Wawa representative said they obtained irrigation design and a certificate of occupancy from the City of Alachua and that city standards differed from county standards. ACEPD staff responded that county irrigation registration and design standards apply countywide and that the county reviews irrigation applications separately from city building permits. "There are ways to meet both codes that would satisfy Alachua County's requirements, as well as the city's requirements," ACEPD staff said, and recommended coordination between applicants and ACEPD.
Celebration Point’s landscape representative, James Thornton, said his company resubmitted an application and paid the county fee; ACEPD reported the application was still deficient and the agency granted additional time for resubmittal and inspection scheduling. The magistrate granted scheduling leeway in some cases while directing companies to stay in contact with ACEPD to avoid fines.
The hearing underscores recurring compliance challenges when commercial developments coordinate city building approvals and county code requirements for specialized systems like permanent irrigation.
