Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sheriff opposes HR clarification to incentive pay policy; committee asks HR to revise language
Summary
Human Resources sought to add clarifying language to Resolution 2024-34 on the internal Incentive Pay Policy; Sheriff Torgerson opposed the proposed change, Supervisor Lawler said the current language appears subjective, and Vice Chair Eggen directed HR to work with departments and return with revised language next month.
Human Resources asked the committee Oct. 1 to add clarifying language to Resolution 2024-34 to spell out the purpose of the county’s internal departmental Incentive Pay Policy. H.R. staff reported routine operational metrics — continued HRIS implementation, meetings with the insurance broker for open enrollment, one exit interview, zero work-comp claims, 41 applications processed, nine interviews conducted, seven new hires, one separation, and a current employee count of 289. The Neighborhood Clinic balance was reported at $44,281 as of August invoices.
Sheriff Torgerson objected to changing the resolution’s language, telling the committee he “does not feel there is any issue with the way the policy is being implemented.” Supervisor Lawler said the existing language contains a lot of subjectivity and could benefit from clarification. Vice Chair David Eggen directed H.R. to work with departments to rewrite the clarifying language and to return with a revised proposal at the next committee meeting.
The request to amend Resolution 2024-34 produced no formal motion or vote on the change; the committee’s action was to ask H.R. to rework the wording and bring the item back next month. The minutes do not record additional suggested text or a departmental proponent speaking by name.
Next steps: H.R. will collaborate with department staff to revise the language and present the revised proposal to the committee at its next meeting.
