Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Audit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Audit returns clean opinion but GASB accounting change increases accrued‑leave liability; board approves $6.9M supplemental budget

Parkrose School District Board of Education · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The district reported an unmodified audit opinion but said a GASB accounting change pushed accrued compensated‑absence liability to about $6 million and lowered reported fund balance; the board approved a $6.9 million supplemental budget amendment and discussed short-term cash tools including a possible tax anticipation note.

District finance staff briefed the Parkrose School District board on Feb. 23 about a recent audit, an accounting change that materially affected reported liabilities, and a proposed supplemental budget that would increase total appropriations by roughly $6.9 million.

The district’s auditor issued an unmodified (clean) opinion, the finance presenter said. At the same time, a change in government accounting standards required the district to recognize accrued compensated absences (sick and vacation-related liabilities) more fully. Sherry (speaker 7) said the liability moved from historically reported amounts in the tens of thousands to an estimated roughly $6,000,000 under the new GASB treatment, and that on the district’s financial statement the beginning fund balance moved from about $5.4 million to about $1.1 million as a result.

Sherry explained how the GASB requirement works: the district had to examine staff leave balances over multi‑year trends, calculate estimated liability at current wage levels and recognize the resulting compensated-absence figure. “We went from our liability of being 70,000 to 6,000,000,” Sherry said, adding that the auditors issued no management comments and the audit was otherwise clean.

The board reviewed a proposed supplemental budget that Sherry said totals roughly $6,900,000 (a ~7.7% increase in total appropriations). The supplemental adjusts grant funds, makes internal transfers, and adds a contingency-style dummy grant to avoid appropriation-level violations created by new GASB capitalization and reporting obligations. Sherry said the district paid about $29,800 for last year’s audit and that next year’s audit fee will likely rise 2–3%.

Board members asked how the district will manage near-term cash needs given reduced reported fund balance; Sherry said staff will consult with Piper Jaffray and the state about a short-term tax anticipation note in the range of $1.5 million to $3 million to bridge cash flow until property-tax receipts arrive in the fall. She said the district typically pools cash conservatively, uses government investment pools and aims to avoid budget violations.

After discussion, the board approved a resolution amending the 2025–26 budget (the supplemental) by voice vote. The board also approved the MESD local service plan and the interdistrict transfer announcement in separate votes.

Sherry said staff will prepare the required resolution documentation, finalize roughly 600 journal entries and coordinate with auditors and state reporting as required; the board requested continued updates on cash‑flow plans and bargaining implications for labor costs.