Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Dalton holds first reading of $130 million utilities revenue bond to finance new power plant

City of Dalton mayor and council · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council presented a first reading of a bond ordinance to issue $130 million in combined utilities revenue bonds for a proposed ~57 MW power plant; staff said bonds would be backed by utility revenues and no vote was taken — the ordinance requires a second reading.

City staff presented a first reading on March 16 of Ordinance 26-05 to authorize issuance of City of Dalton combined utilities revenue bond series 2026 in the principal amount of $130,000,000 to fund construction of a new roughly 57-megawatt power plant.

John (staff) described the financing structure: the proposed bonds are revenue bonds that would be pledged against utility revenues rather than the city’s general-tax pledge. He said that approach separates utility debt service from general-government debt and noted that, under reasonable assumptions, local generation capacity could reduce the city’s future wholesale power costs. He characterized the project as potentially “very viable” compared with long-term wholesale purchases and estimated annual cash-flow savings on the order of $2 million for equivalent capacity compared with market purchases.

Council members asked for clarity on city responsibilities and on whether the financing would affect broader city borrowing capacity; staff reiterated that utility revenues, not general-tax revenues, would be pledged. The ordinance was presented as a first reading; no council action occurred that evening. City staff said the measure requires two readings before the council can act and it will be scheduled on a future agenda for a second reading and possible adoption.

Because the item was a first reading, council did not record a vote. Staff committed to return with additional details and formal ordinance language at the next hearing for deliberation.