Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Design review board approves Hot Monk digital marquee; members call for a sign-ordinance review
Summary
The Sebastopol Design Review Board approved Hot Monk Tavern's request to replace a marquee with a static digital sign, but several board members abstained or urged a formal update of the city's sign regulations to address illuminated and digital signage.
The Sebastopol Design Review Board approved a request by Hot Monk Tavern owner Bill DeCarly to replace the venue's existing changeable-letter marquee with an electrically controlled digital sign, after staff said the proposal will use dimmed, non-rotating text and could be used for public-safety messaging.
The approval came after public comment split between opponents who raised health and visual-impact concerns about LED and digital signs and supporters who said the upgrade improves safety and reduces staff risk when updating messages. One resident called municipal traffic surveys into question and urged stronger scrutiny of nearby development projects.
Staff's report said the proposed sign measures 50 inches by 84 inches, will be submitted as an internally illuminated fixture and that any work within Caltrans right-of-way would require separate permits. The report recommended approval, noting staff had asked the applicant to provide dimming and to avoid moving text to reduce driver distraction. Applicant Bill DeCarly told the board the existing marquee was damaged by a vehicle and required frequent manual maintenance; replacing it would reduce staff exposure and support daily venue updates for performances and events.
During deliberations, board members expressed differing views about the sign's visual and safety impacts. One member said such new technology "is a completely new animal" and urged a study before turning down or approving similar requests; another said the sign is informative and appropriate for an event venue. A motion to approve the application passed; recorded tallies show the motion carried with three yes votes and two abstentions. The board also discussed initiating a formal review of the sign ordinance to clarify rules for backlit, internally illuminated and digital signage.
Board and staff members asked staff to agendize an ordinance review and to study whether an addendum addressing emerging digital sign technology should be drafted for design review and city council consideration. Staff outlined the steps: design review input, planning-commission recommendation, city council readings, and a 30-day waiting period after second reading before the ordinance would take effect.
The board's approval is subject to the standard seven-day appeal period to the planning department.
