Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ward 2 councilor says he has 'no confidence' in mayor; residents press city over prosecutor's conduct
Summary
A Ward 2 councilor told the Evanston City Council he has 'no confidence' in the mayor and criticized how the city handled complaints; several residents also accused the city prosecutor of overreach and said they plan to pursue legal remedies. The council said it would review the concerns and that the prosecutor's findings will be posted to the city website.
A city councilor who identified himself as representing Ward 2 told the Evanston City Council that he has "0 confidence in our mayor," accusing the mayor of failing to investigate several internal matters and of inserting a mayoral letter that undercut a council resolution.
The councilor said two earlier resolutions had been forwarded to the state and that a mayoral letter attached to one of them discouraged conversations with the Wyoming State Hospital; he said none of several related incidents were properly investigated. "If anything, maybe sneaky and underhanded," the councilor said, and repeated that he thought the subsequent probe by the city prosecutor into four council members over alleged Open Meetings Act violations was "a waste of taxpayers' time."
Multiple members of the public amplified those concerns during public participation. One resident who identified no public office accused City Prosecutor Mister Harris of filing a summons without providing supporting evidence, refusing to receive exculpatory material and improperly involving the prosecutor in routine planning and engineering communications. "This is a trivial civil matter wasting its resources," the resident said, and said he planned to bring lawsuits and Bar Association complaints that, he warned, would impose discovery burdens on city staff and could be costly for taxpayers.
The council did not vote on any disciplinary measures or launch a separate investigation during the meeting. A councilor said copies of Mister Harris's findings had been placed in a council member's envelope and that the city prosecutor would post his findings on the city website and provide them to the local paper. The chair said the comments had been heard and would be taken "under advisement," and that the council would have to "think through" and address the concerns at a future time.
Why it matters: The assertions raise questions about internal council communications, the role of the city prosecutor, and whether the council and administration are handling allegations and public records in a way that preserves public trust. Council members and residents urged clearer, more open discussion of contested matters and better leadership.
The meeting record shows no formal actions were taken on the accusations; councilors and the public said they expect follow-up and that related documents will be posted online.
