Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Resolution 2026 0035 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff briefs council on proposed map amendments to EIS; no action taken

Spokane City Council · May 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City planning staff briefed the council on two council-member amendments to Resolution 2026-0035 (selection of a preferred alternative for an environmental impact statement): a Cathcart amendment extending Francis Avenue’s study area and two Zippone amendments removing intensity at North Indian Trail and adding intensity north of Wellesley along a transit corridor. Staff circulated the amendments and did not request action today.

City planning staff presented proposed map changes tied to Resolution 2026-0035, which would select a preferred alternative for an environmental impact statement.

Spencer Gardner, representing staff, described the Cathcart amendment as extending a section of Francis Avenue — roughly between Crestline and the Market Street/North Spokane corridor — so that staff could consider increased land-use intensity there. Gardner said the Zippone amendments would remove a small "bubble" of proposed intensity at North Indian Trail (where the neighborhood opposed the change) and would add increased intensity north of Wellesley along a high-frequency transit route and briefly west on Francis toward the transit center.

Gardner said the amendments are geographically isolated and can be adopted independently; staff circulated the language early for council review and did not request action at the agenda-review meeting. A neighborhood representative told the council the community opposed the North Indian Trail intensity because the area has limited access ("one road in and one road out") and creating a jobs center there would not make sense, the speaker said.

Council members may consider the circulated amendments at a future meeting; staff did not indicate a final vote date during the briefing.