Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory board tables Dye Flats management plan review after flagging cabin, camping and vehicle access language
Summary
The Daae Community Advisory Board paused its review of the Dye Flats management plan after members raised concerns about municipal‑cabin language, camping provisions, vehicle/ATV access phrasing, insurance thresholds and several code inconsistencies; motion to table passed.
The Daae Community Advisory Board spent the bulk of its March 11 meeting reviewing proposed edits to the Dye Flats written management plan and identified multiple substantive concerns that led the board to table further action until the next regular meeting.
Members repeatedly objected to language that would permit rental of municipal cabins "with or without a municipal fee," arguing the provision could be read as allowing municipal activity to compete with private businesses. Lynn Davidson (S3) urged the board to flag any clause that would permit cabins on road‑accessible parcels and to consider eliminating those provisions: "Anywhere it starts talking about cabin or cabins on any kind of road system, let's flag those for at least future discussion if not elimination."
The board also identified mismatches between different documents and code sections (they referenced Title 19.04 and section 16.080.02) and questioned whether changes attributed to municipal counsel altered the original intent of the Dye Flats plan. Chair (S1) recommended the board consider re‑submitting the original version they previously sent to the clerk and then highlight items they could not accept rather than approving the lawyer’s edits wholesale.
Other technical concerns included: unclear phrasing about prohibited vehicle access (references to "unrestricted access for road vehicles and ATVs" that members sought to reword as prohibition of on‑road and off‑road vehicles in restricted areas); inconsistent camping language where municipal cabins appeared in the camping section; and changes to allowed harvest activities (beach/seaweed harvest and downed firewood) that appeared to be moved or removed in the draft. The board compared recommended liability insurance thresholds mentioned in the draft (one reference to $2,000,000) with their prior suggestion of $500,000.
Given the volume of unresolved edits and policy questions, Joseph Torregursta (S4) moved and members seconded to table the review until the next regular meeting; the motion carried on a voice vote. Before adjourning, members asked staff to bring clarifications from the manager or clerk about specific code intentions and to ensure the community is kept aware of substantive changes being proposed to the Dye Flats plan.
