Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dye Flats Management Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory board raises alarms over draft Dye Flats changes that exempt cabin rentals from 'commercial use'
Summary
At its April 8 meeting, Skagway Municipality’s advisory board flagged a proposed change to the Dye Flats management plan that would exempt certain cabin rentals and other activities from being considered commercial uses and invoked 'Title 19 does not apply' language; members agreed to ask staff and legal for authorship and legal basis and table further action until next meeting.
The Skagway Municipality Advisory Board debated substantial edits to the Dye Flats written management plan at its April 8 meeting, focusing on newly added language that would treat some cabin rentals and other activities as noncommercial and state that Title 19 "does not apply" to the assembly's management provisions.
Board members said the changes, which appear as underlined and bold insertions in the draft, amount to a major shift from the plan's intent and could open Dye Flats to commercial activity. Chair (identified only by role in the transcript) said the change "opens up a door" and asked who authorized the wording; members said they believed the language likely originated with legal staff but were not certain.
Members said the draft also tightened permit-holder liability language (keeping a provision that a permit holder "shall reimburse the municipality for any damages to municipal property caused by the permit holder's activities") and increased the draft's liability-insurance combined single limit from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000, a numeric change that needs to be reflected consistently in the ordinance text. The draft also adds an annual vendor review "to be provided to the borough manager," which board members clarified they would conduct and deliver to the borough manager using the manager's vendor figures.
Why it matters: Advisory-board members said the cabin/rental carve-out conflicts with prior assembly direction and the overall intent of the Dye Flats management plan to preserve recreational, noncommercial uses. They warned the change could permit more intensive development or commercial operations without clear assembly-level review or public input.
What the board did: Members agreed to seek documentation and clarification before taking further action. The board asked Kathy to be the initial contact, with the request copied to Emily and Steve, asking who authored the new cabin-rental and Title 19 language and for the legal basis. The board also discussed inviting administration or the attorney to speak at a public meeting so residents could comment. The board formally moved to table further action on the Dye Flats edits until the next meeting while documentation is gathered.
Statements and exchange: The transcript records sustained concern from the Chair that the wording "does not apply" to Title 19 is an "arbitrary" carve-out and that the change "is a huge change" that requires explanation. A committee member recommended a public process: "it should be a public process…so people have an opportunity to come talk or write letters." Another member asked whether the language originated with the borough attorney or under a manager's direction; the status of authorship remained unresolved in the meeting.
Next steps: The board will send a written request for verification of the contested language's origin and legal basis, CC'ing Emily and Steve, and will revisit the plan at its next meeting. No ordinance or formal adoption occurred at this meeting.
Ending note: The board tabled the item for follow-up; members repeatedly emphasized a desire for transparency and community input before any final change.
