Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Panel reviews verdict and spoliation rulings in DigiNovations dispute

Judicial - Appeals Court Oral Arguments · May 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Appellants argued the jury heard a claim without proof of an executed restrictive covenant and said spoliation sanctions and an adverse‑inference instruction improperly shifted burdens; DigiNovations said the verdict rests on independent fiduciary and tort findings and urged affirmation.

"May it please the court," Justin Engel told the panel, opening for the appellants in DigiNovations v. Veil. Engel said the plaintiff never produced a copy of the alleged restrictive covenant and that no witness testified the appellants had assented to or signed such an agreement. He argued the adverse‑inference instruction and spoliation sanctions improperly allowed the jury to infer an agreement that lacked…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans