Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the South Rim Gravel Pit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge pause, strict limits on proposed South Rim gravel pit during public comment
Summary
Multiple South Rim residents urged the Tooele County Council to pause operations or impose strict traffic, dust and noise controls for a proposed gravel pit now in litigation, raising health, safety and property-value concerns. The council heard comments but took no immediate action on the pit.
Several South Rim residents used the public comment period at the Tooele County Council meeting on March 24 to urge the council to halt or tightly restrict operations at a proposed South Rim gravel pit that is currently involved in litigation.
Amber Enersen, who said she was speaking as a private citizen, told the council the site sits directly in view of her home and raised a series of safety and environmental concerns. She urged that trucks be limited to Mormon Trail for entry and exit, that haul hours be restricted, that speed limits be enforced and that the county require "strong dust and air quality controls, including regular watering and silicone monitoring." She also asked the council to "stop until those litigations have gone through."
Carrie Mann, who also said she faces the site from her property, warned that a pit could depress local property values and produce "air pollution" and ongoing enforcement complaints. "On paper, a gravel pit can look like progress… But in reality, it creates a ripple effect of costs that don't show up on these proposals," she said.
Roy Peterson said the pit would create "unbelievable safety and health problems," noting a prevailing southerly wind that could carry dust toward a nearby community park where children play. Jim Johnson, who said his house is about 100 yards from the site, asked the council to issue a stop order so courts can resolve disputes, saying he had observed equipment testing on the site and asking the county attorney to act.
Council members did not take formal action on the pit during the meeting. The public-comment speakers asked for concrete mitigation measures (designated haul routes, haul-hour limits, dust suppression, notification for blasting) and, in several cases, for the county to pause operations while litigation proceeds. The council moved on to the regular agenda after hearing comments.
What happens next: The council did not vote on the pit or announce any immediate enforcement orders at the March 24 meeting. The matter remains the subject of litigation and may return to the council or staff for permitting, enforcement or other administrative steps in the future.
