Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Centennial’s winter assessments show reading and math growth, presenter says

Centennial School District Board of School Directors · March 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A district education presenter said winter local assessments show K–3 DIBELS above national mid-year benchmarks and that substantial numbers of K–8 students moved from intervention tiers into grade-level tiers in reading and math.

The education-committee presenter (introduced to the board as Mr. Rudz) reviewed the district’s winter local-assessment results and said the data show continuing growth across grades.

For K–3 DIBELS, he said, "All 3 grades, all grades, excuse me, all 4 grades in K–3 scored above the national, middle of the year benchmark." For K–8 reading measured with i-Ready, he reported a 9% movement of students from tiers 2 and 3 into tier 1 at midyear — a change he said represents about 700 students and roughly 28 classrooms. For K–8 math he reported a 14% movement into tier 1 from fall to winter, which he said represents about 490 students (about 20 classrooms).

On typical-growth measures, Rudz said the district is above national medians: "The national norm for reading, with i-Ready, is 55%. We are currently sitting at 80% of that bucket of growth at the halfway point of the year." For math he reported typical-growth at about 58%, compared with a national median of 52%.

He cautioned that a field test of advanced students in some grades had removed those students from the I-Ready math dataset, and that those students’ results were reported separately. Board members praised the continued growth and asked for comparisons with prior years; Rudz said growth trends are comparable to the last several years and described growth as a precursor to future achievement gains.

Why it matters: Local assessment trends inform instruction, intervention and resource allocation. The numbers presented will feed into planning, multi-tiered systems of support and curriculum consistency work.

What’s next: The education committee and district staff will continue to monitor and refine interventions and report back on year-end achievement indicators.