Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Technology Asset Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District outlines outsourcing of device buyback to vendor Second Life; board questions pricing, guarantees and community storefront
Summary
Administration proposed outsourcing the student device buyback to a vendor (Second Life) that would collect obsolete devices, grade them, run an online storefront open to the community, offer a $50 coupon for district buyers, and guarantee a minimum payment; the finance committee discussed estimated proceeds (around $188,000–$189,000), pricing tiers, and service details.
Get email alerts on the Technology Asset Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administration described a proposed agreement with a third‑party vendor, Second Life, to handle collection, grading and resale of district devices (primarily ninth‑generation tablets collected from fourth, eighth and twelfth graders). The vendor would operate an online storefront available to the community, provide a warranty and customer service, and offer a coupon for district buyers. Finance committee representatives said they pushed the vendor to increase the initial coupon offer from $20 to $50 to improve affordability for families.
Committee members discussed pricing, product generation differences and market valuation. Administration said last year’s lower‑generation devices sold to students for around $60; ninth‑generation devices are higher spec, and the district expects the market value—and therefore retail price—to be higher. The proposal includes a guaranteed minimum payment to the district (committee discussion referenced a rounding figure of approximately $188,000–$189,000 for expected device returns) and a 3% share of online sales to the district in addition to the buyback proceeds.
Board members asked how the vendor’s storefront inventory would be replenished, whether buyers could pay other than by credit card, and what the warranty and customer service arrangements would be; administration said orders are shipped via FedEx and the vendor commits to same‑day shipping for orders placed before a daily cutoff and that payment was currently credit‑card only. Administration emphasized staffing constraints next year as a driver for outsourcing the in‑house program.
The board did not approve the vendor agreement in this meeting; the item was discussed in finance and will be brought forward for formal action at a future meeting after clarifications and final contract terms are prepared.
Representative quote from administration: "So now they're gonna offer $50 off the device, which would bring it to..." (committee discussion regarding vendor coupon).

