Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Arena Coliseum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board authorizes negotiators for Coliseum and arena-complex property talks
Summary
The Alameda County Board of Supervisors authorized county negotiators for ongoing discussions with the City of Oakland over the Oakland–Alameda County Coliseum and arena complex, after public comment urging transparency; the vote passed 4–0 with one excused.
President Halbert introduced item 18, a continued matter authorizing county negotiators for real-property talks concerning the Oakland–Alameda County Coliseum and arena complex and asked for public comment. Online commenter Blair Beekman urged the board to involve the AASEG as a mediator and praised the practice of pairing a closed session with a public meeting on the same day.
County Counsel explained that the open-session action before the board was limited to identifying and authorizing county negotiators to comply with Government Code requirements; the actual terms and strategy for negotiation would be discussed in closed session. President Halbert moved the item and Supervisor Fortunato Bass seconded.
The board then took a roll-call vote. Supervisors Marquez, Tam and Fortunato Bass and President Halbert voted yes; Supervisor Miley was excused. The motion passed and the board recessed into closed session to discuss negotiation terms.
What the board authorized: the open-session minute describes authorization of Patrick O’Connell and county administrator’s office staff to act as the county’s designated negotiators for the Coliseum/arena complex negotiations and identifies the City of Oakland’s negotiator as Justin Johnson or his designee (the terms themselves were deferred to closed session).
Why it matters: authorizing negotiators formalizes the county’s delegation to begin or continue negotiations over the complex, which involves county-owned property and prospective development or management arrangements with the City of Oakland. Public commenters urged transparency and community involvement in the process.
Next steps: the board recessed to closed session to negotiate terms. The open-session vote was procedural and was taken to comply with state law that requires naming negotiators before negotiations proceed in closed session.
