Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances SB17 to Committee of the Whole to ease out‑of‑network dispute process for emergency providers
Summary
SB17, sponsored by Representatives Stewart and a co‑prime, would codify the DOI process and require transparency from health plans so providers can determine the correct dispute route; the committee moved the bill unanimously to the Committee of the Whole after supportive testimony from emergency physicians and consumer advocates.
The House Health & Human Services Committee on Feb. 25 moved Senate Bill 17 to the Committee of the Whole after proponents described the bill as a practical fix to a costly and inefficient dispute process for emergency providers.
Representative Stewart told the committee the bill is the product of three years of negotiation among physicians, health plans, consumer advocates and the Division of Insurance. The legislation codifies an alternative dispute resolution pathway and requires health plans to provide jurisdictional and methodology transparency so providers can tell whether a plan is regulated by Colorado or by federal law.
Emergency physicians and physician‑group advocates told the committee the current arbitration process is often more expensive than the disputed payments, making it uneconomic for small or rural practices to pursue claims. Dr. Jacob Altholtz, representing the state chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians, said the bill helps address an imbalance that threatens the sustainability of emergency care in some communities.
Consumer advocates with the Colorado Consumer Health Initiative supported the bill as a way to preserve patient protections while improving transparency. After sponsor remarks and supporting testimony the vice chair moved the bill to the Committee of the Whole; the chair announced unanimous passage in the committee.
What happens next: SB17 will be considered by the Committee of the Whole. Sponsors and proponents said they will continue to gather data about outstanding disputes and monitor effects if the measure advances.
