Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Fleet topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners press administration for justification on replacing patrol hybrids with Tahoes

City Commission, City of Largo · April 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners pushed staff to clarify a proposed replacement of patrol hybrids with Chevrolet Tahoes, citing a roughly $14,000-per-vehicle premium and lifecycle cost concerns; administration authorized two Tahoes for specific roles and asked police to justify broader replacements.

A sustained exchange at the work session focused on a proposed change in the police vehicle replacement plan that would move from hybrid patrol SUVs to Chevrolet Tahoes for some patrol roles. One commissioner said the Tahoe option was about $14,000 more per vehicle than previously budgeted options and asked where the funds would come from if the commission approved the change.

"I don't know how you could fit this in the budget... we don't have the money for the Tahoes because it's, like, $14,000 per vehicle more than what we had budgeted for police vehicles," a commissioner said, urging staff for clarification on the scale of the request and whether it represented a fleetwide replacement.

City Manager Carson Curb emphasized the long-term fiscal impact and existing commission policy favoring hybrids for general patrol use. "Keep in mind, 20 Tahoes this year is a 180 over 9 years. So it's not a 1 time cost. It is a 9 year continual cost," he said, adding that the commission recently directed administration to continue providing hybrid vehicles where appropriate. Curb said staff had approved two Tahoes for specific roles (SWAT supervisors) that need additional cargo capacity but had not seen justification for converting the entire patrol fleet.

Several commissioners asked staff to obtain more detailed cost-of-ownership information and to have the police chief explain operational needs that would require larger vehicles. The commission did not take a vote at the work session; members directed staff to follow up with the police chief and produce clarifying information at a future meeting.

The administration said it would provide context on replacement cycles, lifetime costs and the specific operational reasons purchase requests had been made, so the commission could decide whether to authorize broader changes to the fleet-replacement plan.