Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agenda And Minutes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic District Commission approves prior minutes and amends agenda to allow off-site applicant discussion
Summary
On March 26, 2026, the Historic District Commission approved the previous meeting's minutes (four yes, two abstentions) and approved an amended agenda to swap items 8 and 9 and briefly reconvene in the Development Conference Room for a non-voting discussion with an applicant's architect; the meeting recessed after finding no citizen comments.
The Historic District Commission met on March 26, 2026, and approved the minutes from its prior meeting and an amended agenda that will allow a non-voting discussion with an applicant’s architect in the Development Conference Room.
Chairman Kelsey called the meeting to order, led the roll call and confirmed a quorum. Jamie, a staff member, told commissioners the staff recommended two changes to the agenda: “Flip flipping 8 and 9 that will allow us to do other business in the... Development Conference Room” and, after citizen comments, to recess and reconvene there for non-voting discussion and updates. Jamie added, “Staff doesn't know of any changes unless y'all have any changes.”
A motion to approve the previous meeting minutes was made and seconded; a roll-call vote recorded Commissioners Looney, Dean, Hall and Chairman Kelsey voting yes and Commissioners Walker and Givens abstaining. Commissioner Cox did not register a response on the record; the motion to approve the minutes carried.
Commissioners then voted to adopt the formal agenda, including Jamie’s proposed adjustments. The roll-call vote on the agenda showed Commissioners Looney, Dean, Givens, Hall, Walker and Chairman Kelsey voting in favor; the agenda passed. Chairman Kelsey then asked for citizen comments; one person was present but no public comment was taken on the record. The commission recessed to enable the brief move to the Development Conference Room for the non-voting discussion with the applicant’s architect.
The commission did not take any other substantive actions on the record before recessing. The meeting will continue in the Development Conference Room for development updates and the non-voting applicant discussion as described.
