Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.
Planning Board approves 10‑unit multifamily at 48–52 Waterville Road amid neighborhood concerns
Summary
The Planning Board approved a major site‑plan review for a three‑story, 10‑unit multifamily building at 48 and 52 Waterville Road. The presenter described utilities, a proposed propane pad and a rain garden; a nearby resident raised safety and tax‑exemption concerns.
The Planning Board voted to approve a major site‑plan review for a three‑story, 10‑unit multifamily building at 48 and 52 Waterville Road.
The project presenter described the building, associated parking, lighting and proposed landscaping intended to respect neighboring properties. "It is a 10 unit multifamily building, with an associated parking lot, lighting, proposed landscaping along the side property lines to respect the neighboring letters," the presenter said. The project would include new domestic and fire water services, sanitary sewer, underground electric and telecom, stormwater measures and a proposed rain garden. The presenter also noted one minor change since the last submission: a concrete pad to accommodate a perpetual propane tank for heating systems.
The board asked the team to study pedestrian access from the French Street frontage. The presenter said the grade change is substantial — more than about 12 feet of elevation — and that adding stairs would require more than 20 full risers, replacement of retaining walls and embankment regrading, so stairs were not pursued. The presenter said the project team formally notified the fire chief and that the chief responded with "no initial concerns."
During public comment, Ryan Wing, who identified himself as a resident of 36 Woodrow Road, said the area already contains assisted housing and described increased turnover and safety worries near his home: "I'm already watching my back door, my side door, and my front door." He also said he would prefer a parking lot rather than another housing building. Board members responded that the town needs more housing and that replacing dilapidated structures with new facilities can be beneficial. The presenter said nonprofit status and tax consequences are a separate matter for Selectmen and tax authorities.
A motion to approve the site plan was made and seconded; the board voted to approve. The board arranged to sign project documents following the meeting.
